Archive
‘Sage of Aquarius’ sees epic bear loss
When a HELOC is used for a business
How to spend extra money smartly
New Credit Card Rules Spells Good News For Debt Relief
One of the greatest culprits for serious debt problems are credit cards. Obviously it is our bad use or management of credit cards that causes the debt problems, you can’t blame a gun for what its owner does with it. Nevertheless some guns are more trigger sensitive than others, and it’s not the same to own an automatic machine gun than an air gun. It’s all about understanding the rules of the game and what the real cost of your credit is. The Obama administration have backed the implementation of new credit card rules that will help many of us to save money and stop paying so much of it to the banks in fees and penalties.
What are the new rules?
Raise interest rates on existing balance. This is a great victory for consumers. This is a little known tool banks had in their arsenal of money making methods. In fact most of us probably didn’t know the bank could increase the rate of interest on our credit card without asking. If you think of it that is pretty crazy because the interest rates on credit cards are already huge.
Payments will pay off your most expensive debts first. Borrowers using credit cards, especially when transferring balance from one card to another, can find themselves with different rates of interest for debts on the same card. Previously there was not guideline or rule on which part of the debt banks must use your monthly payments to cover. Obviously banks had an incentive to pay the cheaper interest rates first and leave the most expensive rates to last. With this new credit card rule that will not be a legal course of action for banks that must allow borrowers to pay off their most expensive credit card debt first.
Other cards can’t penalize you for missing a deadline on another cards. We all know that banks are a closed knit community. They might compete against each other but when they are dealing with borrowers data, credit record and payment history they are happy to share their knowledge. They can still share information on delinquent credit card payers but can’t hold it against them.
None of these measures will stop the banking industry from making more and more money on our misuse of credit cards but it has plugged some holes banks will no longer abuse.
Related posts:
Related posts:Fewer mortgage applications as rates rise
Zero interest on I bond confuses saver
U.S. to mortgage firms: Pick up the pace
Homebuilder’s survival strategy – stimulus
Banks Dirty Secret Of Profitable Foreclosures
Despite the governments efforts to provide loan modifications for individuals and families in financial difficulties that are at risk of foreclosing on their loans the mortgage aid seems to be moving too slow for all the families to benefit from it.
This has made many experts to question why banks are moving so slowly to take advantage of a program that is designed to help both the borrower and the lender. The idea is that mortgage modifications benefit both borrowers and lenders as they allow banks to receive payments they would not get if the mortgage foreclosed in a buyers market where the security (normally the house itself) is in negative equity.
However recent research quoted in today´s Washington Post indicates that this only holds true with a certain kind of borrower, the type of borrower that truly can´t pay the monthly mortgage payments at the current level but would be able to pay them if the monthly payments were reduced. This is only one of three types of borrowers though. It seems that with the other two types of borrowers, loan modifications are just not cost effective.
These two types comprise:
1) Borrowers that are in such financial strife that no loan modification or mortgage refinance is going to help in the long run, ultimately they are going to have foreclose their loan.
2) Borrowers that can meet the payments even though this might mean serious financial difficulties, even losing their life savings.
Banks and lenders have little incentive to help either of these demographics of borrowers.
To illustrate imagine if you were a lender, a bank or even a private company that provided loans for a profit. Obviously you demand some sort of security to protect your investment in case the borrower cannot or will not pay, this could be jewelry, thee deeds of a property or a car. Then one day the borrower tells you he is going through financial hardship and needs a break in his payments, a reduction in his debt or his monthly payments. However you realize that this borrower is not going to be able to pay his loan whether you help him now or not. Negotiating with him now is just going to cost you money in time, work and whatever reduction or break you provide for his loan. On the other hand you could simply foreclose his loan and claim the security without losing nearly as much. What would you do?
Even the kindest philanthropic can see the negative incentive that such a lender would have to actually negotiate a solution with the borrower.
Could this explain why loan modifications are moving so slowly despite the huge incentive programs the government is providing to encourage loan modifications on mortgages that risk foreclosure.
It seems that Obama´s administration has also seen this flaw in their system and is currently negotiating with banks for further incentives for the provision of loan modifications to the most vulnerable borrowers.
Related posts:
Related posts:















