Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Incentives’

Loan Modifications Alternatives: HAFA Starts Its New Program Today

April 5th, 2010 No comments


Today HAFA, also known as the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives starts to work. What will it mean for troubled homeowners? For a start the program increases Treasury’s contribution to homeowners from $1,500 to $3,000, while the contribution for junior lien holders gets a rise from $3,000 to $6,000.

Why is Treasury looking for different ways to give money away? Because the previous ways do not seem to be working. Loan modifications sponsored by the HOPE program also include juicy contributions by Treasury to both homeowners and servicers, but that does not seem to have made much of a difference. The government is now trying to look into short sales as a more pragmatic way of dealing with the wave of foreclosures that is hitting the housing market.

HAFA is designed to speed up the process for homeowners that are seeking for alternative ways to foreclosure, but do not qualify for a loan modification. It is also a smart option for homeowners that are so underwater they do not want to even apply for a loan modification, and just want to get rid of a bad investment with the minimum damage to their credit rating.

What does the program offer? The program principally provides extra incentives to homeowners, servicers and junior lien holders to fast track a short sale application. For instance a homeowners that undergoes a short sale on their home can receive up to $3,000 for their trouble. However, this is not the most interesting feature of this new scheme. Short sales has always been a better option than foreclosing on your home, most homeowners can be helped to understand that it is in their best interest to short sale if they cannot get a loan modification and are going to foreclose on their home.

The problem is that troubled homeowners often have a second mortgage on their property. These secondary mortgage lenders are called junior lien holders. They can stall the short sale process, and often do if they feel there will not be enough money to pay them once the house or property is sold. HAFA looks to give junior lien holders an extra incentive by giving them up to $6,000 if they agree to let the short sale proceed.

This program indicates two things. First the government seems to be changing gears in their pursuit of stabilizing the housing market. The initial focus on providing loan modifications to eligible homeowners is changing. The HOPE loan modification program continues, but the government seeks to complement it by encouraging alternatives like short sales to those that are not eligible for a loan modification. Second, the Obama administration is finally looking at the real issue, most troubled homeowners are in trouble not because their mortgage interests are too high, but because they do not have a job, or enough income to pay a mortgage. It also takes into account solvent homeowners that simply want to let their homes go, and provides them a cleaner way to break their mortgage contract.

Related posts:

  1. More than Half of Completed Loan Modifications Re-Default; Why?
  2. Loan Modification Alternatives: Short Sale Your Home
  3. The Obama Administration Has a Brainstorming Session with the Hardest Hit States; What Should the TARP Fund Be Spent On?

Related posts:
  1. More than Half of Completed Loan Modifications Re-Default; Why?
  2. Loan Modification Alternatives: Short Sale Your Home
  3. The Obama Administration Has a Brainstorming Session with the Hardest Hit States; What Should the TARP Fund Be Spent On?

HAMP Loan Modifications and “In-house” Modifications, What Is The Difference?

January 31st, 2010 No comments


A loan modification is a loan modification, right? If it helps you avoid a foreclosure on your home it is good news, right? Not necessarily. It is a little more complicated than all that.

HAMP is a Government sponsored loan modification program. This might not give you much peace of mind but the truth is that mortgagees that are part of this program must follow certain requirements in order to receive the incentives the Government offers for loss mitigation actions, another name for loan modifications.

These requirements have been recently (Nov. 23rd 2009) updated and include:

1)      Mortgagees must reduce the interest rate of a loan modification to the market rate. Market rate is defined by the Government as the most recent Freddie Mac Weekly Primary Mortgage Survey Rate for a 30 year fixed-rate conforming mortgage.

2)      The Mortgagee must re-amortize the total unpaid amount due over a 360 month period from the due date of the first installment of the modified loan. This is code for: the bank has to offer you a 30 year fixed-rate loan at the market rate.

However, if you go for an in-house loan modification or even for a mortgage refinance your mortgagee is not required to follow these rules. This doesn’t mean the in-house mortgage modification will be bad or any worse than the HAMP loan modification. You might find your mortgage provider is really generous and wants to improve the Government’s deal out of the goodness of his heart. No? You don’t think that is likely?

The problem is that even the relatively good terms HAMP loan modifications offer are no guarantee you will get approved or that you will even get a decision on your loan modification before your mortgage forecloses. Lenders use this fact to push borrowers into choosing a bad loan modification in the belief that a bad loan mod in the hand is worth two in the bush. Is that true?

The alternative to the HAMP loan modification or in-house mortgage modification is to simply walk away from your mortgage, but that is another story.

In conclusion, only you can decide if a loan modification is the right move for you, but if you do decide to go for a loan modification it is most likely you will get a better deal if you go with a HAMP loan modification. Unfortunately many banks are using the fact that HAMP loan modifications are slow and hard to get to push their own in-house subprime loan modifications.

Related posts:

  1. HAMP, Way Out For Delinquent Borrowers And Those Without Fannie
  2. Credit Crisis: Are Loan Modifications The Answer
  3. Loan Modifications Are Going To Be Simpler, What Do You Need Now?

Related posts:
  1. HAMP, Way Out For Delinquent Borrowers And Those Without Fannie
  2. Credit Crisis: Are Loan Modifications The Answer
  3. Loan Modifications Are Going To Be Simpler, What Do You Need Now?

Loan Modifications Are They Worth It – An Overview In Simple English

January 28th, 2010 No comments


Loan Modifications do seem to have finally got moving. Trial loan modifications are heading towards their first million, there has been over a 100,000 completed loan modifications and even Bank of America, the sleeping giant of loan modifications has hit the 200,000 trial modifications line.

However, what is not clear is if loan modifications are actually a good thing for homeowners. Reports published in this website have shown that loan modifications may be pushing homeowners deeper underwater instead of lending them a helping hand, pun intended.

This is because many banks are simply cashing in the Government’s incentives while capitalizing the late payments and interest charges onto the loan modification without reducing interest rates or extending the loan term, reducing the principal balance of the loan is, of course, very rarely even mentioned.

So is it worth going for a loan modification? It depends on:

1)      How good a deal you can get on your loan modification.

2)      How underwater your home is and

3)      How much you care about your home

Let’s analyze these three questions to see if loan modifications are worth it in your particular scenario.

1)      You are getting a good deal on your loan modification if the lender reduces your interest rates and your monthly payments are significantly cheaper. Unfortunately, in the recent past banks have got away with providing loan modifications that simply put borrowers further into debt. However, Government guidelines effective from the 23rd of November 2009 clearly state that loan modifications under the HAMP program, which provides incentives to lenders, must reduce the interest rate to the current market rate.

This is the pertinent paragraph in the Mortgagee letter 2009-35 from the Government to all approved mortgage providers:

The Mortgagee shall reduce the loan modification note rate to the current Market Rate.  For purposes of this requirement, the Department shall consider Market Rate to be no more than 50 basis points greater than the most recent Freddie Mac Weekly Primary Mortgage Market Survey Rate for 30-year fixed-rate conforming mortgages (US average), rounded to the nearest one-eighth of one percent (0.125%), as of the date the Modification Agreement is executed.

What does this mean in practice?

The next paragraph in Mortgage letter 2009-35 gives the answer with an example (italics and underlining are ours):

The Mortgagee approves a Loan Modification that is executed by the borrower 35 days after the date of this Mortgagee Letter.  The current note rate is 7 percent and the most recent Freddie Mac Weekly Primary Mortgage Market Survey Rate for 30-year fixed rate conforming mortgages (US average) as of the Modification date is 5.04 percent.  To be eligible for payment of a mortgagee incentive and costs for a title search and/or recording fees on the Loan Modification, the fixed note rate on the modified loan may not exceed 5.50 percent (The Freddie Mac US average rate of 5.04 percent rounded to the nearest eight of a percent plus 50 basis points).

If your mortgage provider reduces your interest rate by nearly 1.5% you are likely and extends the mortgage for 30 years you are likely to see a very significant reduction in your monthly payments. However, don’t forget to check what the term extension will translate to in extra interest and make sure you can live with it.

2)      If your mortgage is so underwater there are little chances it will ever be worth what you bought it for and you just started paying for it, you need to decide if it is even worth trying to save it. Walking away, taking the hit on your credit and starting fresh might be the best option for you.

3)      Of course this depends how much you have emotionally invested in your home. If you can’t find another home in the area and you don’t want to change your children’s school, or you need to live near your parents the financial value of your home might only be one of the factors you have to consider.

Related posts:

  1. HAMP Loan Modifications and “In-house” Modifications, What Is The Difference?
  2. Are Loan Modifications Worth your time
  3. Loan Modifications, Loss Mitigation Incentives and Other Greedy Games

Related posts:
  1. HAMP Loan Modifications and “In-house” Modifications, What Is The Difference?
  2. Are Loan Modifications Worth your time
  3. Loan Modifications, Loss Mitigation Incentives and Other Greedy Games

Loan Modifications, Loss Mitigation Incentives and Other Greedy Games

January 28th, 2010 No comments


Have you ever heard about having your cake and eating it? That’s what many mortgage providers are trying to do with loan modifications. How so? As it is well known the Government offers lenders incentives for processing loss mitigation actions. Loss mitigation action is code for loan modifications. What has been the result of the Government’s loan modification incentive program?

Banks, lenders and servicer have of course gladly accepted these “incentives” for processing loan modifications. But what has been the result for borrowers?

Mortgage Letter 2009-35 sent to all Government approved mortgagees on September 23rd 2009 provides a surprisingly honest picture. This letter is quite interesting as an exercise in stating the obvious and calling mortgagee providers thieves to their greedy faces.

The second paragraph of Mortgage Letter 2009-35 is priceless:

The recent economic slow-down has increased demand for loss mitigation actions, including but not limited to, loan modifications.  Recent industry studies of these loan modifications revealed that borrowers who experienced an increased mortgage payment on a modified loan had a significantly higher re-default rate than borrowers whose loan modification provided a lower payment.

If you thought loan modification research studies were a waste of time, think again. The Government has come up with a breakthrough. Borrowers in financial trouble are more likely to re-default on their mortgages when their monthly mortgages are increased! Shocking.

I’m sure David H. Stevens, Assistant Secretary for Housing, the author of the letter, knew he was stating the obvious because the in the very next paragraph he hits the mortgage industry with a brutal honesty that is refreshing to say the least:

FHA reviewed its recent insured loan modifications and found that, generally, they resulted in higher payments to the borrower. The higher payment was the result of not lowering the interest rate to the current market rate and/or not extending the term to the maximum of thirty years authorized under 24 CFR 203.616.  Generally, the loan modifications simply capitalized the past due amounts and allowable charges and did not extend the term of the loan.

May I personally congratulate Mr Stevens, or whoever writes his letters, on the construction of that paragraph. There is nothing we didn’t know there but it is nice when a Government official simply goes out on a limb and says it.

So this is the picture: Banks provide loan modifications to troubled home owners which generally don’t reduce their monthly payments and simply add on the late charges and interest to the mortgage without even extending the loan term and get an incentive from the Government for their troubles.

The above mentioned letter set out that these practices were to stop in a 30 day period from the date of the letter, that was the end of November 2009, and that any loan modifications where the interest rate was not reduced would not apply for a loan modification incentive. I guess it is a start.

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications Are They Worth It – An Overview In Simple English
  2. HAMP Loan Modifications and “In-house” Modifications, What Is The Difference?
  3. Loan Modifications With Principal Cuts Attract Lenders Attention

Related posts:
  1. Loan Modifications Are They Worth It – An Overview In Simple English
  2. HAMP Loan Modifications and “In-house” Modifications, What Is The Difference?
  3. Loan Modifications With Principal Cuts Attract Lenders Attention

Loan Modification Foreclosure Prevention Companies Looking For Affiliate Sale Representatives

January 11th, 2010 No comments


Loan Modifications are big business. People are willing to pay large sums of money to modify their mortgages to monthly payments they can afford. Many companies are willing to supply financial knowhow and procedures to smooth the process towards a loan modification.

These companies advertise as experts that understand all the ins and outs of the loan modification world. They claim to speed up the procedure and know all the right answers a layperson could not possibly do on their own.  In order to attract customers loan modification agencies like 1ST Foreclosure Prevention are opening affiliate programs. These affiliate programs offer incentives and bonuses to sales representatives that attract new customers in the same way that insurance or car salespeople take a cut from a sale.

Affiliate Sales Representatives are asked to have a strong motivation and enthusiasm as well as good communication skills with the borrowers, which They are not expected to be mortgage or loan experts, that is the job of the company, the only responsibility they have is to attract the customers. The attractions for the posts are mainly the money and being able to work from home.

Things were never so good for loan modification and refinancing companies so they are all on a hiring spree. The five digit salaries loan modification companies advertise are sure to attract attention. The question is if borrowers should pay agents for loan modifications.

As usual your opinion will depend on if you stand to gain or not from the operation. Loan modification agents will argue that loan modifications are complex procedures which the average layperson is unsuited to perform and that loan modification agents offer a valuable service to borrowers that might otherwise not be able to take advantage of a loan modification.

The Obama Administration is however encouraging borrowers to turn to government sponsored loan modification advice centers for free help and are discouraging homeowners from paying for a service they can do themselves or get done for free.

Whatever you decide to do it is important to remember that loan modification agents, no matter how good they are, cannot guarantee a loan modification will be accepted, that is up to the lender. Other factors like the mortgage’s NPV test also condition the outcome of the loan modification application. This means that the agent has no way of guaranteeing success no matter how much he charges. It is important not to pay for loan modification services upfront before they are carried out.

It is also important to understand how the loan modification process works and what you are expected to supply to your lender. Loan modifications depend on two main factors: What your house is worth and what you can afford to pay. Loan modification agents will help you to fill in the loan modification paperwork in a way that does not undermine your chances of getting a loan modification.

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modification Meets GMAIL, The New Loan Modification Company On The Block
  2. Shady Loan Modification Companies Told To Get Out Of Town By AG
  3. Commercial Loan Modification Companies: How To Choose A Good Loan Modification Company

Related posts:
  1. Loan Modification Meets GMAIL, The New Loan Modification Company On The Block
  2. Shady Loan Modification Companies Told To Get Out Of Town By AG
  3. Commercial Loan Modification Companies: How To Choose A Good Loan Modification Company

Loan Modifications, A Loose, Lose Story With No Winners

December 23rd, 2009 No comments


Loan Modifications have been touted as the solution to all evils brought about by the latest economic crises and as the worst idea an administration has ever had.

The administration shouts out that the whole point of Loan Modifications is to help the middle class by giving them a break on their underwater mortgages while many commentators claim that it is just one more ploy to funnel money to big bank corporations that have already received billions in bailout money.

How is it that such an apparently simple idea as modifying the interest rates, loan tenure, and if the borrower is really lucky, the loan principal, is received with such opposite feelings?

The reason is that it is a loose, loose program where neither lenders nor borrowers get what they really want. The intention was good when designing the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) but just as the Communist Manifesto sounded great on paper, the reality is that in practice it simply doesn’t work.

As nobody gets what they want everybody suspects it is a ploy to steal their money so nobody makes the effort needed to make it happen. Another way to see it is that the government is not creating the incentives that would make the ploy work.

Borrowers Loose:

The whole Loan Modification Program is based on a three month trial period that must be “passed” before the loan mod is permanent. In order to qualify borrowers must provide proof of income, pay their monthly payments on time every month, after which they must supply more paperwork. This creates a bottleneck where a lot of applications come in, 750,000 seems to be the last count, but only a very few actually make it to permanent loan modification, around 31,000. And of the few that make it even fewer are that much better off. The reason being that when a loan is underwater, or put another way, when a borrower owes more than his house is worth, the only real long term solution is to reduce the principal. If you don’t the borrower still owes more than his house is worth and there is little incentive to pay for an investment that is upside down when the borrower could simply walk away from a sour deal and put his money elsewhere.

Lenders lose:

Many feel that the only winners in the loan modification (a.ka. HAMP) program are corporate banks. One argument explains that the whole program is designed to squeeze three extra months out of underwater borrowers that would otherwise not think about paying another month. Others feel that it is only another way to get money to banks through the incentives the program offers.

The three month trial scam does carry some credibility because it costs the bank little to reduce payments for three months and carry on with foreclosure proceedings. The cost of manning the loan modification and running the paperwork would probably be covered by receiving payments from the three month trial.

However it seems silly to think that the whole program is designed to give bonuses to banks. The government only pays a “bonus” to banks when they complete a permanent loan modification and there has only been 31,000 of them up-to-date. The maximum incentive a bank can receive for a loan modification is around $4,000 over a period of three to four years, which means that in total the government will pay in the next three to four years around $124,000,000. Compare $4,000 with the loss a bank incurs when they reduce the interest rate of a loan which climbs into the tens of thousands plus whatever principal reduction might be involved. Although it is true that foreclosures are also expensive it is not as if the government’s measly incentive is going to make a loan modification a great deal. This is why banks are not in a hurry to carry out loan modifications, in most cases it is bad business, and even when there is a small margin to be made the rate of re-default with modified loans is high and banks might just be kicking the can down the road a few blocks.

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications, Story Of Struggle For Banks And Borrowers Alike
  2. Foreclosure Re-default Drops by 26.5 When Loan Modifications Reduce Loan Balance
  3. U.S Loan Modifications Hit Obama’s target Early But Nobody’s Impressed

Related posts:
  1. Loan Modifications, Story Of Struggle For Banks And Borrowers Alike
  2. Foreclosure Re-default Drops by 26.5 When Loan Modifications Reduce Loan Balance
  3. U.S Loan Modifications Hit Obama’s target Early But Nobody’s Impressed

Loan Modifications, 5 Things the Government Is Not Doing But Should

November 4th, 2009 No comments


Mortgage foreclosures are increasing steadily as home values plummet and layoffs are becoming ever more common while homeowners crumble under the weight of mortgages they can no longer afford.
The administration is working hard to increase the number of loan modifications to help out struggling homeowners. However higher unemployment rates are making it hard for homeowners to afford even good prime mortgages loan modifications struggle to improve. Also, foreclosures often prove to be a cheaper alternative for mortgage providers when the real cost of loan modifications is calculated.
So what can be done to fix this situation? Although far from total solutions I will put forward five possible measures. Some would be unpopular, others hard to implement but the truth is that easy fixes are just not there to be found.
1)    Mandate Loan Modifications.
Up to now the government has tried to court mortgage providers into making loan modifications. Providing incentives and often footing the entire bill of loan modifications. This could be changed if the administration regulates foreclosures and makes it a legal requirement for banks to offer modifications before they can foreclose a loan or mortgage.
2)    Provide Principal Reductions on Existing Loans.

Unless you actually reduce the principal (amount borrowed) of a loan you are not really helping, just lengthening the loan and making it harder regain equity on the home. Equity is the best incentive for homeowners to pay their mortgage payments. If you feel your home is worth more than you owe on it you see it as an investment worth protecting that you can sell at a profit if things get real bad.

3)    Ease Accounting Rules for Loan Modifications.

Messy accounting procedures and bureaucracy’s red tape is responsible for much of the cost of loan modifications making them hard to enforce and expensive to make. Even the 500,000 plus loan trials the HAMP program has managed to make ahead of schedule will have to undergo further paperwork and potential bureaucracy pits once the three month trials are finished which will probably cause many of the loan trials to fall through.

4)    More Transparent and Uniform Loan Modifications Reports.

Every bank or mortgage provider seems to have their own system to measure eligible borrowers and how they report their loan modifications. This makes it difficult to set uniform procedures, require targets and regulate the efficiency of loan providers.

5)    Limit Fees For Borrowers.

Fees charged to borrowers are so high that even if a homeowner falls in difficult times for brief period he/she can fall into a spiral of debt due to the high fees and penalties he or she incurs. Also, loan modifications tend to include expensive fees for the homeowner just to apply for.

Related posts:

  1. U.S Loan Modifications Hit Obama’s target Early But Nobody’s Impressed
  2. Loan Modifications, Servicers and Who Is Profiting From the Credit Crisis
  3. Obamas Loan Modification Success Explained

Related posts:
  1. U.S Loan Modifications Hit Obama’s target Early But Nobody’s Impressed
  2. Loan Modifications, Servicers and Who Is Profiting From the Credit Crisis
  3. Obamas Loan Modification Success Explained

[News] Report: Foreclosure More Profitable than Loan Modifications for Servicers

October 20th, 2009 No comments
The incentives mortgage servicers receive for managing a home loan are a significant obstacle to loan modification that would help financially troubled borrowers avoid foreclosure, according to a new report from the National Consumer Law Center.

HAMP, Way Out For Delinquent Borrowers And Those Without Fannie

October 7th, 2009 No comments


It seems Obama’s administration has a program for every issue. If you are struggling with your mortgage but are keeping up with your payments (wouldn’t that be 90% of us) you can get help with HARP. If you are delinquent (behind in your monthly mortgage payments) you can try your luck with HAMP.

HAMP stands for Home Affordable Modification Program. The program is designed to help borrowers who are struggling to keep their loans current or who are already behind. HAMP does this by providing incentives to mortgage loan servicers to modify existing first lien (primary) mortgages. The Treasure hopes this will motivate mortgage providers to move faster with loan modifications. It doesn’t seem to be working quite as planned but the effort is certainly there.

What makes HAMP any different to the other loan modification programs? To start, as mentioned above you can apply for HAMP even though you are behind in your payments. You can also apply for a HAMP loan modification even if your mortgage is not provided or guaranteed by Fannie or Freddie, a requirement most other government programs have.

So what are the requirements for a HAMP Loan Modification?

1.) You must have a home and live in it. The home must have one to four units.

2.) You must owe a principal balance (the actual amount you borrowed without interest) that is equal or less than:
1 Unit: $729,750
2 Units: $934,200
3 Units: $1,129,250
4 Units: $1,403,400;

3.) Be the primary mortgage and have been contracted before January 2009.
Your monthly payments must be greater than 31 percent of your monthly income. If it isn’t we kind of assume you don’t need a mortgage modification.

Unfortunately for many the mortgage is the least of their “loan problems”.
Have a mortgage that is not affordable due to financial hardship that can be documented (that means you can prove it).

If you answered yes to all the above questions you MAY qualify for a HAMP loan modification. The final yes will have to come from your mortgage provider. You must contact your provider in order to find that out.

But what if you aren’t behind in your payments, can you apply for a HAMP Loan Modification.

Yes, the requirements are those stipulated above, no more, no less.  This is good news for borrowers that are making payments, want a loan modification in order to take advantage of the lower interest rates but can’t do so because their home value has dropped and they don’t have a mortgage with Fannie or Freddie.

What you will need to do is prove why you are struggling to make your payments. This will have to be documented so be ready to show paperwork to back your claim.

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications, Story Of Struggle For Banks And Borrowers Alike
  2. Loan Modifications and FHA Refinance What Is The Deal
  3. The Obama Loan Modification Aid Program, What Are The Benefits?

Related posts:
  1. Loan Modifications, Story Of Struggle For Banks And Borrowers Alike
  2. Loan Modifications and FHA Refinance What Is The Deal
  3. The Obama Loan Modification Aid Program, What Are The Benefits?

Loan Modifications, Hope, Lies and Misinformation

September 17th, 2009 No comments


Many believe that the only way to get out of an economic crisis is to buy yourself out of it. To spend enough to jumpstart the economy again. Loan Modifications are one of the tools the Government are using to get homeowners out of the whole they dug for themselves before they bury the whole economy with them.
Such is the determination and commitment the government has to this project they have earmarked 75 billion dollars to stimulate loan modifications on qualifying mortgages. That is the Hope anyway. The Hope is that changing the mortgages, reducing monthly payments, extending tenures, providing bonuses to borrowers as well as lenders and dropping interest rates will buy America’s homeowners out of the credit crisis.
Sadly it could seem that Hope, empty hope is all there is to this program. One of the foundations of the program is the assumption that banks will make an effort to create loan modifications for homeowners that are at risk of losing their homes. This is done by providing incentives to banks and homeowners to agree to sustainable loan modification. However the problem is that banks only have to “put forth an effort” and provide basic statistics in order to receive the stimulus. They are obliged to provide statistics on how many homeowners they’ve contacted but in no way forced to approve any loan modifications or even stop foreclosures while a loan modification is arranged.
Even if a loan modification is approved there is no assurance that it will be beneficial or even worthwhile for the homeowners. The cost of getting the loan modification can be so expensive and the monthly payment reduction so low it is not worthwhile to go through. One borrower is reported to have spent nearly $10,000 for a loan modification that only reduced the monthly payment by $25. To add insult to injury this outrageous waste of money will probably end up being a statistic that is used to show how generous and helpful banks are being.
After all is said and done the loan modification program is progressing very slowly. The number of loan modifications is around 200,000 while 9 million home loans are at risk to foreclose by next year.
Because there is no requirement for banks to make a real effort on loan modifications that are not profitable for them, the question remains if it is reasonable for us to expect banks to invest in providing loan modifications that are going to cost them money, money they are not likely to see turn any profit.
A more creative approach is needed to find a real solution to the credit crisis. Loan modifications on their own do not seem to the answer. The Hope Mortgage Program is actually only geared for homeowners that can still deal with a mortgage at a reduced rate. Those worst off cannot expect any help from the government.

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications, lies, scams and misinformation
  2. Loan Modifications Only Hope For American Dream
  3. Mortgage Modifications Drop But Mortgage Workouts Rise in HOPE

Related posts:
  1. Loan Modifications, lies, scams and misinformation
  2. Loan Modifications Only Hope For American Dream
  3. Mortgage Modifications Drop But Mortgage Workouts Rise in HOPE