Recent projections estimate that by June, over 5 million homeowners will be heavily underwater. Let us define that a little more precisely. You are heavily underwater if the current market value of your home is only 75% of the balance on your mortgage. Between you and me, this means you are pretty screwed. The scary part is that if this projection proves true 10% of all US homeowners will be in this pickle; not the place you want an economy to be if you are trying to dig yourself out of a recession.
This is why the Obama Administration is running about like headless chickens trying to find solutions to this problem, quick, mid-term, and long term solutions; any kind of solution that will get us out of this.
It was this kind of panic that caused the government to put all their weight behind HAMP, the government’s loan modification program. Loan modifications were and always have been procedures designed to help homeowners stuck with sub-premium loans. Sub-premium loans as you all know is a kind way of talking of usury, loans with interest rates so high they give you vertigo if just to think about them. However loan modifications are not, and never have been a fix for homeowners with great loans that are unemployed and cannot afford their mortgage.
What alternative solutions are there?
One proposal is to buy time by simply banning foreclosures until other options have been looked into by the homeowner and lender. You have to love that proposal, if you cannot stop homes foreclosing by economics just make it illegal. As crazy as this measure seems it is designed to buy time and allow homeowners to find ways of keeping their home. This would take the current guideline of asking lenders to evaluate defaulting homeowners for a loan modification to the next level by making it compulsory.
The Mortgage Bankers Association says its members are already following this principle, and that foreclosure is always a last resort when all other options have been exhausted.
Another plan sponsored by the Mortgage Bankers Association is to not modify permanently the loans of troubled homeowners that have lost their jobs but simply to reduce their mortgage payments substantially for up to nine months to give homeowners a chance of looking for a new job.
As you probably guessed the Banker’s Association is requesting Treasury to pay for the program. Nevertheless, it does seem like a good idea to provide a homeowners with a break until he finds a new job than taking forever to marginally reduce the mortgage payments of an unemployed borrower.
However, many are analysts are saying that the real strategy to follow is to find a way to improve the economy. A strong job market would pull out the housing market from the fix it is in. On this theme, there were some good news last week. The number of homeowners starting to default unexpectedly dropped in the fourth quarter of 2009. However, the government also reported that home prices dropped by 1.6% in December; making it clear that the economy still has a long way to go before it gets a clean bill of health.
Related posts:
The Obama administration and all the agencies at its disposal are working around the clock to save troubled loans but it is simply not good or fast enough.
In the third quarter there was a 6.2% rise of all seriously delinquent (i.e. 60 days or more past due) and 3.2% increase of all loans in the process of foreclosure.
What is even scarier is that even prime mortgages, those loans with the best interest rates and conditions also rose heavily.
However banks and loan servicers do seem to have stepped on the gas a little and supported the government’s efforts through the HAMP program, or Home Affordable Modification Program. Out of every 6 troubled homeowner one received a permanent or trial loan modification. Unfortunately the homeowners that get a trial but don’t get a permanent modification make up most of that figure. The bad news is that even those who do get a permanent loan modification (31,000 out of 750,000 in the last count) half tend to re-default with 6 months. The good news is that that loan mods done in the second quarter show a lower initial re-default rate. This could be because lenders are making more generous loan modification and reducing monthly payments more aggressively to make payments more likely.
So how are mortgages performing? Badly seems to be the sad consensus. 87 percent of all US home loans are listed as performing, which obviously means 13% aren’t. Government backed mortgages are not faring much better, in some cases worse. Only 83% of the Veterans Benefits Administration loans are “performing”. Fannie and Freddie mortgages (with government backing) are not celebrating with 8% of their mortgages “not performing.
It is not all bad news. The housing market with low interest rates and a large portfolio of “cheap” homes is attracting buyers. This large inventory is likely to stay with us for a while as banks continue to try to unload their distressed properties and troubled homeowners continue to agree to “short sales”.
According to First American CoreLogic one in four home loans is still “under water” or has a mortgage that is worth more than its current value.
What is the government doing to fight this situation?
Two main strategies: 1) Keep the housing market stable by keeping the interest rates low.
2) Loan Modifications.
The first strategy does seem to be helping by encouraging buyers to invest in a new home. Loan modifications are not meeting with the expectations but the latest figures do show that re-defaulting has dropped with the latest more generous mods.
Related posts:
