Prime Loans Archives – Refinance – Mortgage Refinancing Rates And Information

Unemployment Home Loans, Are They A Real Alternative To Loan Modifications

March 11th, 2010 No comments

The last three years have seen an amazing growth in the number of schemes designed to help homeowners keep their homes and help them avoid foreclosure. However, this is becoming increasingly difficult as the issue homeowners are having with their mortgages is not so much the interest rate and loan tenures, but with the fact they have lost their jobs, and cannot afford any kind of mortgage payments.

The fact that homeowners cannot afford their mortgages due to unemployment makes it very hard for governments to design the right loan modification or aid that will work for lenders and borrowers. The truth is that in many cases banks will profit more, or lose less, from foreclosures than loan modifications.

A new type of aid has been put forward to respond to the increasing percentage of prime loans that are heading towards foreclosure due to unemployment. These mortgages have little to be improved on; they generally have low interest rates and reasonable payment conditions. However, job loss has made it impossible for borrowers to continue making payments. The new solution is to provide temporary aid to the homeowner until he or she finds a job. This is an easier pill to swallow for lenders than making principal balance reductions or permanent loan modifications. It also sidesteps the long and slow road of loan modification trials.

However the question is what type of temporary aid should be provided. There are a variety of proposals. One is to simply pay the loans for unemployed homeowners that cannot afford their mortgage for a set number of months. This type of aid is already in place in various states.

Another option is to provide these borrowers with loans, the payment of which is deferred to a further date. This option does seem like giving people more rope with which to hang themselves, but it might be good is some circumstances. A third option some banks like Citibank have already started to use is to simply defer payments on a mortgage for a few months. The above mentioned bank has offered in some qualified cases 6 month deferment on mortgage payments to allow the borrower to get back on his or her feet.

This is a great option for the right borrowers because a) it does not cost the mortgage that much, b) does not have to go through such a strict and long selection process and c) actually deals with the problem of unemployed homeowners that do not qualify for loan modifications.

Needless to say many banks are wary of rescheduling payments that may never be made and putting off a foreclosure process that may already be inevitable. This is why the Government should look into the possibility of adding this measure to their flagship HAMP program and think of alternative measures that will deal with the increase in unemployment instead of just focusing on reducing interest rates. Many feel that the government is simply fighting the wrong war, (we are still talking about mortgages by the way) this measure might realign efforts in a direction that might be more productive. However a good selection process will be needed to assure that those that qualify really have the potential to find a job that will allow them to make realistic payments on their mortgage.

Share At:

Hide Sites

Related posts:

The Good Side of Loan Modification’s Failure, A Buoyant Foreclosure Market

March 9th, 2010 No comments

Despite the Government’s best efforts and greatest intentions the wave of foreclosures continues to increase. The borrowers that are now defaulting on their mortgages and not qualifying for loan modifications are no longer people with subprime loans and bad credit rating. The fastest growing demographic in foreclosures are prime borrowers with prime loans that have lost their jobs and cannot afford any kind of deal on their mortgage.

This is a tragedy for the millions of families that face losing their homes. However there is a flip side to the crisis in the housing market. The flip side is that the foreclosure market is doing great. More and more buyers with cash in their pockets are looking for bargains among the millions of homes that are going through a foreclosure.

Many have the idea that the only homes that are on the foreclosure market are located in crime-ridden areas and are run down shacks. This is simply not true, during economic crisis like the one we are now going through all kinds of homes can be found, from beachfront luxury homes to shacks in the ghetto.

There is another myth a serious buyer must forget about as soon as possible. You are not going to find a great property selling at pennies on the dollar. Sometimes you can find amazing deals but this is probably because there are other circumstances that reduce the value of the home besides being on the foreclosure market.

However, you can get some great deals and discounts. A typical discount is probably around 5% less than the market value, although you can sometimes pay up to 30% or 40% less.

If you are savvy enough, this could only be the beginning of your savings. If you buy the property from the lender you could ask/demand for some of the buying costs to be waivered. If you ask nicely you might even get a discount on the interest rate or a break on the down payment.

Buying a home, whether on the foreclosure market or not, is a huge investment for most of us. It is therefore worth us spending some time doing our research and due diligence before we spend tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The foreclosure ball begins to roll when a borrowers falls behind on mortgage payments. A homeowner that loves his home will try his best to keep his home, making some payments, looking for a loan modification, or any other measure he can. However, if the home still forecloses the chances are that maintenance has not been carried out for some time on the home. Include the costs of bring maintenance up-to-date in your investment research.

What this might include will depend on the property. Some just need some gentle manicuring, while others have underlying structural damage that is prohibitively expensive to fix. It is true that homes in need of some tender lover and care will come at a discount, but it is important to make sure you can afford the cost of providing it.

Share At:

Hide Sites

Related posts:

The Obama Loan Modification Plan, An Overview

March 2nd, 2010 No comments

This Thursday the Obama Loan Modification Plan, HAMP, will be a year old. It was on the 4^th of March, 2009 that the Obama administration started the largest and most ambitious homeowner’s aid package since the 1930s. The goal was to stop the wave of foreclosures that was destroying the housing market. The Government’s reply was huge. The aim was to help four million homeowners avoid foreclosure and they were willing to spend $75 billion to do so. How are things looking as we approach HAMP’s first birthday. By December 2009 there were nearly 760,000 loans in the trial stage of the program. This three month trial stage is designed to test if the homeowner will pay his modified loan for three months before the modification is final. However, only 31,000 homeowners had actually received a permanent loan modification by the end of 2009. Of these many had seen only the slightest of changes to their monthly payments. The Obama administration realized they needed to do more, and quickly. This triggered a list of amendments and countermeasures designed to speed up the process and open the doors to more homeowners. Soon it became obvious that the issue was not the interest rates of bad loans that were hurting homeowners but the increasing rates of unemployment that was reducing the income of homeowners that could not afford to pay for their mortgage. In fact, the fastest growing demographic in the foreclosure market consisted of homeowners with prime loans that had lost their jobs. From the beginning of the program, the Treasury Department made it very clear that the program would not cater for families that no longer had an income because of losing their job. The aid was focused on families whose income had shrunk but could still afford the payments of a modified loan. Another issue was the complexity of the loan modification process. Homeowners complained that mortgage servicers were not consistent, lost important documents regularly and did not provide accurate information. Mortgage servicers on the other hand explained that homeowners often did not provide the right documentation and were less than honest when filling forms. Treasury reacted by simplifying the system and providing greater concessions to lenders and mortgage servicers. Industry leaders often made the valid point that the HAMP plan incentives did not cover the costs and it was better for them to continue charging fees from delinquent homeowners and foreclosure proceedings than approve loan modifications. The reaction was to increase the incentives and the arm twisting of lenders that would not comply with the program’s expectations. The incentives did become rather generous for both servicers and borrowers. Every loan a servicer modified came with a $1,000 upfront payment, with an extra thousand dollars every year the homeowners was current on payments. This means the Treasury will pay $1,000 every year the borrower is not delinquent, to reduce the loan balance. However the biggest subsidy was offered to reduce the actual monthly payments of mortgages. If the lender could reduce the monthly payments to 38% of the borrower’s income the government would pay for the cost of reducing the payments to 31% of the family’s income. The problem is that these measures have not been sufficient to stem the increase in foreclosures and new guidelines are being worked on to look for a solution. Unfortunately the prospects do not look good for the second year of the Obama Loan Modification Plan.

Share At:

Hide Sites

Related posts:

Loan Modification Low Numbers, Why?

December 25th, 2009 No comments

This is the question administration consultants and officials are asking themselves. After using every trick in the book and more to “encourage”, “bribe” and “bully” servicers in providing loan modifications, loan modification conversion rates are still terribly low.

Ineligible Applicants.

Some have reasoned that the reason loan modification conversion rates are so slow is that many borrowers are simply ineligible under the current loan modification program, also called Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). HAMP does condition acceptance into the program, homeowners must be able to afford the modified payments, the cost of housing must not exceed 31% of the households income and the NPV test (Net Present Value) must be passed among other requirements before a loan modification is granted permanently.

Wrong Crisis.

A parallel argument is that the HAMP program is simply targeting the wrong problem. The issue, in the opinion of those that voice this argument, not a mortgage crisis, but a credit or unemployment crisis. It must be granted that with many homeowners their mortgage is the least of their worries or at least only one of many.

This argument seems to be validated by the fact that more and more troubled homeowners have prime loans with excellent interest rates and conditions but are struggling with their mortgages because they are unemployed. Modifying the mortgage payments will not help these homeowners which in most cases aren’t eligible for a modification anyway.

Greedy Servicers.

Some have pointed out that in many cases loan modifications simply don’t make sense for servicers because they cost more than they are worth, at least for servicers. Servicers, often banks, manage mortgages for lenders. They don’t supply the cash but deal with customer service, collect payments and pass them on to the lender or lenders of the mortgage.

Loan Modifications are too expensive.

A similar line of reasoning points to high cost of modifying a loan. Lowering the interest of a loan or reducing the principal can cost lenders tens of thousands of dollars with the added risk that borrowers can re-default despite the money invested in the loan modification. From a business standpoint if can seem logical for banks to say no thanks to government incentives which are often inadequate and cash in on a foreclosure.

If any of these explanations are true of if they all contribute to the program is hard to say. What does seem clear is that we are dealing with a complex crisis that will not be defeated with any one silver bullet. A combination of economic and social measures will be required to fight the housing, credit and unemployment crisis the U.S and world as a whole faces.

Share At:

Hide Sites

Related posts:

Loan Modification Program Struggles Under Soaring Prime Loans.

August 22nd, 2009 No comments

Loan Modification figures right now are scary. According to one survey one in eight U.S households that have a mortgage are in foreclosure or will be soon. This puts great pressure on Government Institutions that are trying to help ailing home owners while the numbers just add up. It is like trying to build a dam while the river is still flowing.

As it often happens the problems Loan Modification Programs face are changing. While the focus of Loan Modification programs is on subprime loans (high interest loans generally purchased by people with low credit rating) a new demographic of struggling home owners is appearing.

Foreclosures of Sub prime borrowers that by some accounts ignited the banking crisis are actually slowing down while borrowers with good credit records are deteriorating faster due to falling home prices and job losses.

The MBA (Mortgage Bankers Association reported last week that 13.2% of mortgages on homes with one to four units were at least a month overdue or actually undergoing foreclosure. This a rather steep rise from 12.1% in the first quarter.

These figures are disappointing as many expected foreclosures to drop as home sales have picked up in the last months. However some analysts have commented that we shouldn’t expect significant improvement until 2010 when the economy really starts to improve.

This shift from the decline of sub prime borrowers to prime borrowers is illustrated by the percentage of prime and subprime foreclosures in the last year. Last year 44% of foreclosures were from prime mortgages, now the figure is around 58%. Last year 49% of foreclosures were from sub prime mortgages, now it is 33%. While sub prime mortgages are recovering, prime mortgages are suffering even more.

What can we learn from this?

It could be good news for the measures the administration. We could read this shift as proof that the demographic the administration has chosen to focus their energies on is benefiting from that help and digging itself out of the whole while the demographic that is not highlighted in the programs measures continues to fall.

It is interesting that more than 235,000 borrowers have started a three month loan modification trial under the current administration under the effort of the administration to reduce monthly mortgage payments. But do these loan modifications target the real problems.

Most of these loan modifications target loans that reset to higher interest rates or to home owners with high debt to income ratios. In other words these loan modifications seek to help people who fell for high interest mortgages when the housing industry looked like it was going to soar forever. The idea behind the loan modification programs is to allow borrowers to benefit from the current low interest rates.

However prime borrowers that have gone through dire straits struggle to receive the benefits of this program.

Share At: